NLRB decision reverts Trump Board independent contractor test to Obama-era multi-factor test

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has just weighed in on independent contractors – and has overturned the Trump-era standard in favor of the more complex Obama-era standard. In The Atlantic Opera, 372 NLRB 95 (2023), the NLRB found that makeup artists, wig artists, and hairstylists were improperly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. These workers contracted with the Atlanta Opera during the spring and fall seasons, and the Board held that they were in fact employees, as they did not render services as part of an independent business.

In 2014, the NLRB established a multi-factor test in FedEx Home Delivery, 361 NLRB No. 610 (2014) (FedEx II) based on its existing common law agency approach. Under this test, the following factors were weighed, with no one factor being decisive:

  1. Who controls the details of the work;

  2. Whether the work performed a distinct occupation or business;

  3. Whether the work being performed typically done under the supervision of an employer;

  4. Whether the work requires special skill;

  5. Who supplies the tools or equipment;

  6. The length of the engagement;

  7. Whether compensation is based on time spent or completion of a job;

  8. Whether the employer is in the business of work that is performed;

  9. Whether the parties believe they have created an independent contractor relationship; and

  10. Whether the employer is in business.

In SuperShuttle DFW, Inc., 367 NLRB No. 75 (2019), the Trump Board held that entrepreneurial opportunity for gain or loss is the primary factor (animating principle), analyzed under factor #2, of the independent contractor test. Although other enumerated factors, as well as some non-enumerated factors, were still maintained in the court's analysis, entrepreneurial opportunity for gain and loss became all but decisive.

The NLRB's June 13 decision in The Atlanta Opera "reaffirm[ed] the Board’s commitment to the core common-law principles that the Supreme Court has determined should guide the Board’s consideration of questions involving employee status," said NLRB Chairman Lauren McFerran. Entrepreneurial opportunity for gain and loss remains a factor, but without any special weight to it, reestablishing the Obama Board standard. No one factor will be decisive, and the Board will consider all factors when determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor, aligning with U.S. Supreme Court precedent (United Insurance, 390 U.S. 254 (1968)) holding “all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive.”

 

 

Authored by Kenneth Kirschner, Zachary Siegel, and Nicholas Lauridsen.

Contacts
Kenneth Kirschner
Partner
New York
Zach Siegel
Senior Associate
Philadelphia
Nicholas Lauridsen
Associate
Los Angeles

 

This website is operated by Hogan Lovells International LLP, whose registered office is at Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London, EC1A 2FG. For further details of Hogan Lovells International LLP and the international legal practice that comprises Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses ("Hogan Lovells"), please see our Legal Notices page. © 2024 Hogan Lovells.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.