It was a case that would have major implications for not only the 2024 elections, but all future federal elections in the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court was asked to rule whether the Constitution gave state legislatures exclusive power over redistricting and election rules. It was a decision that could change the vote by creating a political advantage. Would justice prevail? This is the case of Moore v. Harper.
A high-stakes U.S. Supreme Court case with precedent-setting ramifications on federal elections, an NCAA basketball team fighting for its future, and a false allegation that ended the career of a prominent police chief in France. In Proof in Trial Season 3, we delve into these high-profile cases with some of the best lawyers in the business. What does it take to win in the courtroom and what’s at stake if you don’t? Proof in Trial is a series from international law firm Hogan Lovells. Hosted by Cate Stetson.
Subscribe and listen wherever you get your podcasts.
Authored by Neal Katyal, Katie Wellington, and Cate Stetson.
Proof in Trial
Proof in Trial: Appellate Edition: Holmes v. Winter
Proof in Trial: Appellate Edition: Integra Med Analytics LLC et al. v. Providence Health & Services et al.
Proof in Trial: Appellate Edition: Stand Up for California et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al.
Proof in Trial : Public Prosecutor v. Bernard Petit et. al
Proof in Trial: University of Louisville
Are you sure want to delete comment ?
Scan this QR Code to share this content
