• Login
    • Advanced search
    • Title
    • Channel
    • Module
  • Home
  • Industry
    •  

      • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services
      • Automotive
      • Consumer
      • Manufacturing and Industrials
      • Education
      • Energy and Natural Resources
      • Financial Institutions
    •  

      • Insurance
      • Life Sciences and Health Care
      • Private Capital
      • Real Estate
      • Sports, Media and Entertainment
      • Technology and Telecoms
      • Transport and Logistics
  • Practice
    • Corporate & Finance

      • Banking and Loan Finance
      • Business Restructuring and Insolvency
      • Capital Markets
      • Corporate Governance and Public Company Representation
      • Digital Assets and Blockchain
      • Infrastructure, Energy, Resources, and Projects
      • Leveraged and Acquisition Finance
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Pensions
      • Private Equity, Venture Capital and Investment Funds
      • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
      • Tax
      • Transfer Pricing
    • Global Regulatory

      • Administrative and Public Law
      • Antitrust and Competition
      • Communications, Internet, and Media
      • Education
      • Energy Regulatory
      • Environment and Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Food Law
      • Gaming Law
      • Government Contracts and Public Procurement
      • Government Relations and Public Affairs
      • Health
      • Immigration
      • International Trade and Investment
      • Medical Device and Technology Regulatory
      • New Nuclear
      • Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Regulatory
      • Privacy and Cybersecurity
      • Space and Satellite
      • Strategic Operations, Agreements and Regulation
      • Transportation Regulatory
    • Intellectual Property

      • Copyright
      • Designs
      • Domain Names
      • IP and Technology Transactions
      • IP Enforcement
      • Patents
      • Trade Secrets and Confidential Know-how
      • Trademarks and Brands
      • Unfair Competition
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Employment

      • Business and Human Rights
      • Construction and Engineering
      • Corporate and Securities Litigation
      • Employment
      • International Arbitration
      • Investigations, White Collar, and Fraud
      • Products Law
      • Risks, Disputes, and Litigation
  • Comparative guides
  • Engage Premium
  • Login
  • Register
Hogan Lovells Engage 5.7.13
      • Title
      • Channel
      • Module
    • Hit ENTER to search in content
    • Advanced search
    • Login
  • Home
  • Industry
    •  

      • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services
      • Automotive
      • Consumer
      • Manufacturing and Industrials
      • Education
      • Energy and Natural Resources
      • Financial Institutions
    •  

      • Insurance
      • Life Sciences and Health Care
      • Private Capital
      • Real Estate
      • Sports, Media and Entertainment
      • Technology and Telecoms
      • Transport and Logistics
  • Practice
    • Corporate & Finance

      • Banking and Loan Finance
      • Business Restructuring and Insolvency
      • Capital Markets
      • Corporate Governance and Public Company Representation
      • Digital Assets and Blockchain
      • Infrastructure, Energy, Resources, and Projects
      • Leveraged and Acquisition Finance
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Pensions
      • Private Equity, Venture Capital and Investment Funds
      • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
      • Tax
      • Transfer Pricing
    • Global Regulatory

      • Administrative and Public Law
      • Antitrust and Competition
      • Communications, Internet, and Media
      • Education
      • Energy Regulatory
      • Environment and Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Food Law
      • Gaming Law
      • Government Contracts and Public Procurement
      • Government Relations and Public Affairs
      • Health
      • Immigration
      • International Trade and Investment
      • Medical Device and Technology Regulatory
      • New Nuclear
      • Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Regulatory
      • Privacy and Cybersecurity
      • Space and Satellite
      • Strategic Operations, Agreements and Regulation
      • Transportation Regulatory
    • Intellectual Property

      • Copyright
      • Designs
      • Domain Names
      • IP and Technology Transactions
      • IP Enforcement
      • Patents
      • Trade Secrets and Confidential Know-how
      • Trademarks and Brands
      • Unfair Competition
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Employment

      • Business and Human Rights
      • Construction and Engineering
      • Corporate and Securities Litigation
      • Employment
      • International Arbitration
      • Investigations, White Collar, and Fraud
      • Products Law
      • Risks, Disputes, and Litigation
  • Comparative guides
  • Engage Premium
  • Login
  • Register
  1. News
  2. New pay transparency laws impact multi-state employers nationwide

New pay transparency laws impact multi-state employers nationwide

20 February 2023
    • Share by email
    • Share on
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Get link
    • Get QR Code
    • Download
    • Print

Pay transparency laws are proliferating across multiple U.S. states and localities. For example, employers with a single employee in Colorado, California, Washington, or New York City that post advertisements for jobs that could be performed in such jurisdictions—including remote jobs—are likely required to include a good faith range of pay for the job in the advertisements. Laws in these and other jurisdictions (including Connecticut, Maryland, and Nevada, and soon New York State) have other requirements as well, such as requiring employers to disclose pay ranges to job applicants upon request, prohibiting employers from asking job applicants about their salary history or retaliating against employees who discuss their own or other employees’ pay (such a rule also applies to all federal contractors). Pay transparency laws vary in scope, making compliance a challenge for multi-state employers, especially those with remote workers in multiple states.

Index
  1. The changing pay transparency landscape
    1. Consequences for employers
    2. Action items

The changing pay transparency landscape

Pay transparency laws now cover a significant proportion of employers in the United States. Previously, employers had no obligation to disclose pay information when advertising job opportunities, could ask applicants what they earned in their previous jobs during salary negotiations, and generally treated compensation information confidentially. In recent years, however, many states and localities have enacted laws banning employer inquiries about prior pay and prohibiting retaliation against employees who discuss their compensation or the compensation of others. Additionally, some states, such as California, Connecticut, Maryland, Nevada, and Rhode Island, require employers to provide compensation ranges to job applicants upon the applicant’s request or automatically when making a job offer. 

Moreover, new pay transparency laws that go even further have popped up in Colorado, California, Washington, New York City, and elsewhere, and more are coming, including a New York State law slated to go into effect in September 2023. These laws are often written very broadly to cover an employer with as few as one employee in the jurisdiction and require employers to disclose specific types of information about compensation in job advertisements for any jobs that could even potentially be performed within the jurisdiction, either in-person or remotely. Some of the new laws require covered employers to disclose a good faith pay range for each advertised job, whereas others also require disclosure of information about other compensation and benefits, such as bonuses, commissions, and health insurance. Some of the new laws also require employers to disclose internal promotion and transfer opportunities, and the pay associated with these opportunities, to current employees. And some states (California and Illinois) require certain employers to submit their pay data to the state. Other pay transparency bills are pending in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina, and more legislation is expected. 

Consequences for employers

Employers with a either a physical presence or remote employees in any of these jurisdictions need to consider how the pay transparency laws apply to them. Failure to comply may result in an administrative enforcement action or private lawsuit. Some jurisdictions impose significant civil penalties for noncompliance with pay transparency requirements—for example, up to US$10,000 per violation in California and Colorado, and up to US$250,000 per violation in New York City. 

Covered employers will need to establish and maintain pay ranges for their jobs if they have not already done so. Employers should consider the potential consequences of disclosing their pay ranges, which may include employee morale issues when some employees discover they are being paid at the low end (or below) a posted range, or potential pay equity lawsuits when employees believe pay differentials within the organization are due to a protected characteristic such as race, ethnicity, or sex.

Action items

Employers should consider taking the following steps to comply with pay transparency requirements: 

  • Consult with counsel to determine if you are covered by one or more state or local pay transparency laws. Remember that you may have obligations under some of these laws even if you have only one remote employee working in the jurisdiction.
  • If you are covered, determine how you are going to comply. For example, are you going to comply only in specific jurisdictions where a pay transparency law applies to you, or will you take a uniform approach and disclose pay ranges in all job postings nationwide?
  • Decide whether to conduct an internal pay equity review or other evaluation of compensation to identify inconsistencies that may create employee morale issues or potential legal exposure. 
  • Consider an external pay study, given that competitors will have increased visibility into your pay practices. 

We will be hosting a webinar on March 7, 2023, to discuss these laws and their implications, along with recent compensation-related developments for government contractors and public companies. Please consider registering using this link.

For more information regarding how pay transparency may impact your workplace, please contact the Hogan Lovells lawyer with whom you regularly work.

 

 

Authored by Michael DeLarco, George Ingham, Tao Leung, Amy Folsom Kett, and Saydee Schnider.

Contacts
Michael DeLarco
Partner
New York
George Ingham
Partner
Northern Virginia
Tao Leung
Partner
Los Angeles
Amy Kett
Senior Associate
Northern Virginia
Saydee Schnider
Associate
Northern Virginia
Index
  1. The changing pay transparency landscape
    1. Consequences for employers
    2. Action items
Related Materials
LAE Cactus 10 204919150

Colorado employers – are you providing required notices to your employees of all job postings and promotional opportunities?

Wibbitz Landscape-jocelyn-hsu-0JvKRD_GEe4-unsplash

NYC passes amendment to pay transparency law; effective date pushed to November 1, 2022

Keywords Pay Transparency, Pay Disclosure, Compensation, Multi-State Employers, Job Advertisements, Remote Workers
Languages English
Topics Employment, Education Regulatory Compliance and Investigations, Government Contracts and Public Procurement
Countries United States
Delete Comment ?

Are you sure want to delete comment ?

Get link
Embed
Share by email
Get QR Code

Scan this QR Code to share this content

  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Terms of Use

 

This website is operated by Hogan Lovells International LLP, whose registered office is at Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London, EC1A 2FG. For further details of Hogan Lovells International LLP and the international legal practice that comprises Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses ("Hogan Lovells"), please see our Legal Notices page. © 2022 Hogan Lovells.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Thomson Reuters HighQ Logo
© 2023 Hogan Lovells | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service