• Login
    • Advanced search
    • Title
    • Channel
    • Module
  • Home
  • Industry
    •  

      • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services
      • Automotive
      • Consumer
      • Manufacturing and Industrials
      • Education
      • Energy and Natural Resources
      • Financial Institutions
    •  

      • Insurance
      • Life Sciences and Health Care
      • Private Capital
      • Real Estate
      • Sports, Media and Entertainment
      • Technology and Telecoms
      • Transport and Logistics
  • Practice
    • Corporate & Finance

      • Banking and Loan Finance
      • Business Restructuring and Insolvency
      • Capital Markets
      • Corporate Governance and Public Company Representation
      • Digital Assets and Blockchain
      • Infrastructure, Energy, Resources, and Projects
      • Leveraged and Acquisition Finance
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Pensions
      • Private Equity, Venture Capital and Investment Funds
      • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
      • Tax
      • Transfer Pricing
    • Global Regulatory

      • Administrative and Public Law
      • Antitrust and Competition
      • Communications, Internet, and Media
      • Education
      • Energy Regulatory
      • Environment and Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Food Law
      • Gaming Law
      • Government Contracts and Public Procurement
      • Government Relations and Public Affairs
      • Health
      • Immigration
      • International Trade and Investment
      • Medical Device and Technology Regulatory
      • New Nuclear
      • Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Regulatory
      • Privacy and Cybersecurity
      • Space and Satellite
      • Strategic Operations, Agreements and Regulation
      • Transportation Regulatory
    • Intellectual Property

      • Copyright
      • Designs
      • Domain Names
      • IP and Technology Transactions
      • IP Enforcement
      • Patents
      • Trade Secrets and Confidential Know-how
      • Trademarks and Brands
      • Unfair Competition
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Employment

      • Business and Human Rights
      • Construction and Engineering
      • Corporate and Securities Litigation
      • Employment
      • International Arbitration
      • Investigations, White Collar, and Fraud
      • Products Law
      • Risks, Disputes, and Litigation
  • Comparative guides
  • Engage Premium
  • Login
  • Register
Hogan Lovells Engage 5.7.7
      • Title
      • Channel
      • Module
    • Hit ENTER to search in content
    • Advanced search
    • Login
  • Home
  • Industry
    •  

      • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services
      • Automotive
      • Consumer
      • Manufacturing and Industrials
      • Education
      • Energy and Natural Resources
      • Financial Institutions
    •  

      • Insurance
      • Life Sciences and Health Care
      • Private Capital
      • Real Estate
      • Sports, Media and Entertainment
      • Technology and Telecoms
      • Transport and Logistics
  • Practice
    • Corporate & Finance

      • Banking and Loan Finance
      • Business Restructuring and Insolvency
      • Capital Markets
      • Corporate Governance and Public Company Representation
      • Digital Assets and Blockchain
      • Infrastructure, Energy, Resources, and Projects
      • Leveraged and Acquisition Finance
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Pensions
      • Private Equity, Venture Capital and Investment Funds
      • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
      • Tax
      • Transfer Pricing
    • Global Regulatory

      • Administrative and Public Law
      • Antitrust and Competition
      • Communications, Internet, and Media
      • Education
      • Energy Regulatory
      • Environment and Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Food Law
      • Gaming Law
      • Government Contracts and Public Procurement
      • Government Relations and Public Affairs
      • Health
      • Immigration
      • International Trade and Investment
      • Medical Device and Technology Regulatory
      • New Nuclear
      • Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Regulatory
      • Privacy and Cybersecurity
      • Space and Satellite
      • Strategic Operations, Agreements and Regulation
      • Transportation Regulatory
    • Intellectual Property

      • Copyright
      • Designs
      • Domain Names
      • IP and Technology Transactions
      • IP Enforcement
      • Patents
      • Trade Secrets and Confidential Know-how
      • Trademarks and Brands
      • Unfair Competition
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Employment

      • Business and Human Rights
      • Construction and Engineering
      • Corporate and Securities Litigation
      • Employment
      • International Arbitration
      • Investigations, White Collar, and Fraud
      • Products Law
      • Risks, Disputes, and Litigation
  • Comparative guides
  • Engage Premium
  • Login
  • Register
  1. News
  2. Still a right to ask, not to have - UK government responds to flexible working consultation

Still a right to ask, not to have - UK government responds to flexible working consultation

05 December 2022
    • Share by email
    • Share on
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Get link
    • Get QR Code
    • Download
    • Print

The UK government has responded to last year’s consultation on making flexible working the default. The response confirms that the right to request flexible working will be available to all employees, regardless of their length of service. Other changes to the existing flexible working procedure, such as an increase in the number of requests employees can make and a reduction in the period for considering requests, will be introduced through a Private Members’ Bill that has government support.

Index
  1. Key points
  2. Next steps

In 2021 the government consulted on how to make flexible working the default. It has now published its consultation response, which confirms that it will make several changes to the current framework for making flexible working requests. However, the reasons on which employers can rely to refuse requests will not be changed.

Key points

The key points from the response include:

  • Employees will have a right to request flexible working from day one of their employment. At the moment employees can only request flexible working under the statutory procedure if they have 26 weeks’ service. The government believes this change will encourage job mobility and expand the labour market.
  • Employers will have to consult employees about a request. The ACAS Code of Practice on handling flexible working requests already encourages employers to discuss requests with employees, so this is unlikely to represent a significant additional burden.
  • Employees will be able to make two requests for flexible working a year, instead of one.
  • A “reasonable” period for deciding a request will reduce from three months to two, although it will still be possible for employers and employees to agree to extend that period if necessary.
  • Until now, employees making a flexible working request have needed to explain what the effect of the proposed change would be on their employer and how it could be dealt with. The consultation concludes that this is an unnecessary burden for employees, particularly those making a “day one” request, and will remove it.

The government has decided not to change the list of permitted reasons for refusing a request. The consultation is clear that the right to request flexible working remains a right to request not a right to demand and that the existing list of reasons for refusing a request continues to meet employers’ needs.

Next steps

Removing the service requirement for making a request does not need primary legislation so the government will introduce secondary legislation to achieve this. The other changes will be implemented through the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Bill, a Private Members’ Bill that has government support.

It is interesting to note the government’s extensive use of Private Members’ Bills to progress its employment law agenda. There are currently at least six Private Members’ Bills with government support that will make significant changes to the existing legal framework if they complete their passage through Parliament. In addition to the flexible working changes, these include a new duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment, entitlements to neonatal leave and carer’s leave and extended protection against redundancy for employees who are pregnant or returning to work from family leave. 

 

 

Authored by Jo Broadbent and Stefan Martin.

Contacts
Ed Bowyer
Partner
London
Stefan Martin
Partner
London
Index
  1. Key points
  2. Next steps
Related Materials
LAE use only 36

Enhanced family-friendly rights for UK employees

LAE use only 19

Playing catch up - summer employment law developments

Keywords Flexible Working, Family Friendly Rights
Languages English
Topics Employment
Countries United Kingdom
Delete Comment ?

Are you sure want to delete comment ?

Get link
Embed
Share by email
Get QR Code

Scan this QR Code to share this content

  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Terms of Use

 

This website is operated by Hogan Lovells International LLP, whose registered office is at Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London, EC1A 2FG. For further details of Hogan Lovells International LLP and the international legal practice that comprises Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses ("Hogan Lovells"), please see our Legal Notices page. © 2022 Hogan Lovells.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Thomson Reuters HighQ Logo
© 2023 Hogan Lovells | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service