• Login
    • Advanced search
    • Title
    • Channel
    • Module
  • Home
  • Industry
    •  

      • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services
      • Automotive and Mobility
      • Consumer
      • Manufacturing and Industrials
      • Education
      • Energy and Natural Resources
      • Financial Institutions
    •  

      • Insurance
      • Life Sciences and Health Care
      • Private Capital
      • Real Estate
      • Sports, Media and Entertainment
      • Technology and Telecoms
      • Transportation and Logistics
  • Practice
    • Corporate & Finance

      • Banking and Loan Finance
      • Business Restructuring and Insolvency
      • Capital Markets
      • Corporate Governance and Public Company Representation
      • Digital Assets and Blockchain
      • Infrastructure, Energy, Resources, and Projects
      • Leveraged and Acquisition Finance
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Pensions
      • Private Equity, Venture Capital and Investment Funds
      • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
      • Tax
      • Transfer Pricing
    • Global Regulatory

      • Administrative and Public Law
      • Antitrust and Competition
      • Communications, Internet, and Media
      • Education
      • Energy Regulatory
      • Environment and Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Food Law
      • Gaming Law
      • Government Contracts and Public Procurement
      • Government Relations and Public Affairs
      • Health
      • Immigration
      • International Trade and Investment
      • Medical Device and Technology Regulatory
      • New Nuclear
      • Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Regulatory
      • Privacy and Cybersecurity
      • Space and Satellite
      • Strategic Operations, Agreements and Regulation
      • Transportation Regulatory
    • Intellectual Property

      • Copyright
      • Designs
      • Domain Names
      • IP and Technology Transactions
      • IP Enforcement
      • Patents
      • Trade Secrets and Confidential Know-how
      • Trademarks and Brands
      • Unfair Competition
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Employment

      • Business and Human Rights
      • Construction and Engineering
      • Corporate and Securities Litigation
      • Employment
      • International Arbitration
      • Investigations, White Collar, and Fraud
      • Products Law
      • Risks, Disputes, and Litigation
  • Comparative guides
  • Engage Premium
  • Login
  • Register
Hogan Lovells Engage 5.7.22
      • Title
      • Channel
      • Module
    • Hit ENTER to search in content
    • Advanced search
    • Login
  • Home
  • Industry
    •  

      • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services
      • Automotive and Mobility
      • Consumer
      • Manufacturing and Industrials
      • Education
      • Energy and Natural Resources
      • Financial Institutions
    •  

      • Insurance
      • Life Sciences and Health Care
      • Private Capital
      • Real Estate
      • Sports, Media and Entertainment
      • Technology and Telecoms
      • Transportation and Logistics
  • Practice
    • Corporate & Finance

      • Banking and Loan Finance
      • Business Restructuring and Insolvency
      • Capital Markets
      • Corporate Governance and Public Company Representation
      • Digital Assets and Blockchain
      • Infrastructure, Energy, Resources, and Projects
      • Leveraged and Acquisition Finance
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Pensions
      • Private Equity, Venture Capital and Investment Funds
      • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
      • Tax
      • Transfer Pricing
    • Global Regulatory

      • Administrative and Public Law
      • Antitrust and Competition
      • Communications, Internet, and Media
      • Education
      • Energy Regulatory
      • Environment and Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Food Law
      • Gaming Law
      • Government Contracts and Public Procurement
      • Government Relations and Public Affairs
      • Health
      • Immigration
      • International Trade and Investment
      • Medical Device and Technology Regulatory
      • New Nuclear
      • Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Regulatory
      • Privacy and Cybersecurity
      • Space and Satellite
      • Strategic Operations, Agreements and Regulation
      • Transportation Regulatory
    • Intellectual Property

      • Copyright
      • Designs
      • Domain Names
      • IP and Technology Transactions
      • IP Enforcement
      • Patents
      • Trade Secrets and Confidential Know-how
      • Trademarks and Brands
      • Unfair Competition
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Employment

      • Business and Human Rights
      • Construction and Engineering
      • Corporate and Securities Litigation
      • Employment
      • International Arbitration
      • Investigations, White Collar, and Fraud
      • Products Law
      • Risks, Disputes, and Litigation
  • Comparative guides
  • Engage Premium
  • Login
  • Register
  1. News
  2. Squaring the circle - managing conflicts in the Australian GP-led secondaries market

Squaring the circle - managing conflicts in the Australian GP-led secondaries market

23 March 2023
    • Share by email
    • Share on
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Get link
    • Get QR Code
    • Download
    • Print

The GP-led secondaries market is relatively new to Australia but recent transactions show the trend is here to stay. Continuation Funds avoid the need for forced exits from Funds and help provide liquidity. Yet since the GP is on both sides of the transaction, there is an inherent conflict of interest. We look at five ways GPs can protect their position.

Index
  1. Be transparent
  2. Consider fee structure
  3. Be advised
  4. Know the documents
  5. Fairness opinion

The GP-led secondary market is relatively new to Australia, but recent transactions show that the trend is here to stay. The confluence of instability in the global economy, often depressed M&A valuations and a lack of suitable IPOs have highlighted Continuation Funds as a way in which LPs can exit their investments at a respectable valuation whilst giving GPs the option of securing their most-prized assets by way of rolling them into a new special purpose vehicle.

Continuation Funds – sometimes known in the past as "GP-led restructurings" - also avoid the need for forced exits from Funds that have a fixed term, often between seven and ten years. Through the use of the scheme, managers can continue to manage the relevant assets irrespective of the life cycle of the Original Fund. The use of Continuation Funds also helps provide liquidity, which can be a vital consideration towards the end of a Fund's life in a challenging fundraising environment.

Yet the market is not without its challenges.

Since the GP is both the "seller", by virtue of being fiduciary and sponsor selling assets to the New Fund, and the "buyer" being fiduciary and sponsor of the Continuation Fund, there is an inherent conflict of interest. The GP has a particular interest in the transaction which may enable them to realise carried interest, which might incentivise the GP to accept a price lower than the LPs might otherwise be comfortable with.

In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed a new rule that would oblige GPs to obtain a fairness opinion from an independent opinion provider "where an adviser offers Fund investors the option to sell their interests in the private fund, or to exchange them for new interest in another vehicle advised by the adviser. This would provide an important check against an adviser's conflicts of interest in structuring and leading a transaction from which it may stand to profit at the expense of private fund investors". 1

So how can GPs make the most of the opportunities whilst honouring their fiduciary duties and upholding their reputation? We outline five ways GPs can square the circle:

Be transparent

GPs will need to be able to clearly explain why the proposed structure represents the best way forward for Fund investors. The Fund Manager may have particular sector knowledge and relationships that would avoid the uncertainties and disruption of an M&A deal. The GP should be in a position to explain how it will apply the sale proceeds, thereby demonstrating confidence in the upside and driving value for the benefit of the selling investors.

Running a transparent process and providing plentiful disclosure enables LPs to take an informed view as to the benefits of extracting value or rolling their interest over into the new SPV. Enough time should be allowed in terms of proper due diligence, and the GP should be ready to answer questions promptly and fully.

Consider fee structure

Getting the fee structure right isn't just a matter of good business – it can be essential to getting the transaction over the line. The secondary buyer may expect a lower management fee or a lower carried interest rate which can be tiered based on performance. This will also be seen as fair for investors who choose to roll their interest over into the Continuation Fund rather than extract value there, and then by way of an exit.

Be advised

The use of LPACs (LP Advisory Committees) can be a bulwark for good governance when it comes to secondary transactions. Given that the GP has to observe fiduciary duties towards both the old and new Funds, an Advisory Committee, perhaps advised by an independent third-party valuer, can act as a valuable check.

The use of LPACs can also be a comfort to regulators who are often concerned that existing investors are being fairly treated and not railroaded into having to choose between two options, either of which may be for them less than ideal. The LPAC may be asked later down the track to approve conflicts that arise, so early communication with the LPAC is advisable.

Know the documents

The governing documents relevant to the Fund should be thoroughly reviewed alongside documents relating to the underlying asset. This can help alert buyers to restrictions, clawback provisions, requirements for consent, rights of refusal, etc.

Fairness opinion

Obtaining a fairness opinion from an independent third-party valuer will give confidence to all parties that the price being offered is fair. The opinion may be accompanied by a more detailed valuation report of the target assets. A fairness opinion can help assure investors that, in the words of the SEC, the price offered for the asset is based "on underlying valuation that falls within a range of reasonableness".

Hogan Lovells Private Equity team has global sector experience in advising GPs and LPs on how best to maximise potential and value from secondary transactions whilst ensuring that potential conflicts are addressed early on before they can cause problems.

  1. SEC Statement on Private Funds Advisors Proposal, Chair Gary Gensler, 9 February 2022 - https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/gensler-statement-private-fund-advisers-proposal-020922

 

Authored by James Wood and Nigel Sharman.

Contacts
James Wood
Partner
Sydney
Stephanie Keen
Partner
Singapore
Nigel Sharman
Senior Knowledge Lawyer
Hong Kong
Index
  1. Be transparent
  2. Consider fee structure
  3. Be advised
  4. Know the documents
  5. Fairness opinion
Related Materials
Sanctions Navigator

Sanctions Navigator: Russia Sanctions

Additional Resources
  • APAC Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Guide
Keywords Funds, Secondaries, Private Equity, Conflict of interest
Languages English
Topics Fund Formation, Fund Raising, Restructuring and Dissolution, Infrastructure and Energy Funds, Investments, Financing, Portfolio Company Advice and Exits, Private Capital Regulatory, Compliance and Disputes, Private Equity Funds, Venture Capital Funds, Fund Formation, Private Equity Transactions, Venture Capital Transactions, Secondaries, Funds and Asset Management
Countries Australia
Delete Comment ?

Are you sure want to delete comment ?

Get link
Embed
Share by email
Get QR Code

Scan this QR Code to share this content

  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Terms of Use

 

This website is operated by Hogan Lovells International LLP, whose registered office is at Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London, EC1A 2FG. For further details of Hogan Lovells International LLP and the international legal practice that comprises Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses ("Hogan Lovells"), please see our Legal Notices page. © 2022 Hogan Lovells.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Thomson Reuters HighQ Logo
© 2023 Hogan Lovells | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service