• Login
    • Advanced search
    • Title
    • Channel
    • Module
  • Home
  • Industry
    •  

      • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services
      • Automotive
      • Consumer
      • Manufacturing and Industrials
      • Education
      • Energy and Natural Resources
      • Financial Institutions
    •  

      • Insurance
      • Life Sciences and Health Care
      • Private Capital
      • Real Estate
      • Sports, Media and Entertainment
      • Technology and Telecoms
      • Transport and Logistics
  • Practice
    • Corporate & Finance

      • Banking and Loan Finance
      • Blockchain
      • Business Restructuring and Insolvency
      • Capital Markets
      • Corporate Governance and Public Company Representation
      • Infrastructure, Energy, Resources, and Projects
      • Leveraged and Acquisition Finance
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Pensions
      • Private Equity, Venture Capital and Investment Funds
      • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
      • Tax
      • Transfer Pricing
    • Global Regulatory

      • Administrative and Public Law
      • Antitrust and Competition
      • Communications, Internet, and Media
      • Education
      • Energy Regulatory
      • Environment and Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Food Law
      • Gaming Law
      • Government Contracts and Public Procurement
      • Government Relations and Public Affairs
      • Health
      • Immigration
      • International Trade and Investment
      • Medical Device and Technology Regulatory
      • Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Regulatory
      • Privacy and Cybersecurity
      • Space and Satellite
      • Strategic Operations, Agreements and Regulation
      • Transportation Regulatory
    • Intellectual Property

      • Copyright
      • Designs
      • Domain Names
      • IP and Technology Transactions
      • IP Enforcement
      • Patents
      • Trade Secrets and Confidential Know-how
      • Trademarks and Brands
      • Unfair Competition
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Employment

      • Business and Human Rights
      • Construction and Engineering
      • Corporate and Securities Litigation
      • Employment
      • International Arbitration
      • Investigations, White Collar, and Fraud
      • Products Law
      • Risks, Disputes, and Litigation
  • Comparative guides
  • Engage Premium
  • Login
  • Register
Hogan Lovells Engage 5.6.13
      • Title
      • Channel
      • Module
    • Hit ENTER to search in content
    • Advanced search
    • Login
  • Home
  • Industry
    •  

      • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services
      • Automotive
      • Consumer
      • Manufacturing and Industrials
      • Education
      • Energy and Natural Resources
      • Financial Institutions
    •  

      • Insurance
      • Life Sciences and Health Care
      • Private Capital
      • Real Estate
      • Sports, Media and Entertainment
      • Technology and Telecoms
      • Transport and Logistics
  • Practice
    • Corporate & Finance

      • Banking and Loan Finance
      • Blockchain
      • Business Restructuring and Insolvency
      • Capital Markets
      • Corporate Governance and Public Company Representation
      • Infrastructure, Energy, Resources, and Projects
      • Leveraged and Acquisition Finance
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Pensions
      • Private Equity, Venture Capital and Investment Funds
      • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
      • Tax
      • Transfer Pricing
    • Global Regulatory

      • Administrative and Public Law
      • Antitrust and Competition
      • Communications, Internet, and Media
      • Education
      • Energy Regulatory
      • Environment and Natural Resources
      • Financial Services
      • Food Law
      • Gaming Law
      • Government Contracts and Public Procurement
      • Government Relations and Public Affairs
      • Health
      • Immigration
      • International Trade and Investment
      • Medical Device and Technology Regulatory
      • Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Regulatory
      • Privacy and Cybersecurity
      • Space and Satellite
      • Strategic Operations, Agreements and Regulation
      • Transportation Regulatory
    • Intellectual Property

      • Copyright
      • Designs
      • Domain Names
      • IP and Technology Transactions
      • IP Enforcement
      • Patents
      • Trade Secrets and Confidential Know-how
      • Trademarks and Brands
      • Unfair Competition
    • Litigation, Arbitration, and Employment

      • Business and Human Rights
      • Construction and Engineering
      • Corporate and Securities Litigation
      • Employment
      • International Arbitration
      • Investigations, White Collar, and Fraud
      • Products Law
      • Risks, Disputes, and Litigation
  • Comparative guides
  • Engage Premium
  • Login
  • Register
  1. News
  2. Fashion Nova slapped with $4.2M fine for filtering out negative reviews online

Fashion Nova slapped with $4.2M fine for filtering out negative reviews online

07 February 2022
    • Share by email
    • Share on
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Get link
    • Get QR Code
    • Download
    • Print

Suppressing negative customer reviews may lead to costly consequences. Online fashion retailer Fashion Nova recently settled the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) allegations that the company blocked negative online reviews of its products on its website – to the tune of $4.2 million. The FTC’s complaint had alleged that the product reviews on Fashion Nova’s website were misrepresentative, because Fashion Nova suppressed customer reviews with less favorable ratings. This complaint is the first of its kind issued by the FTC. Consumer companies should be careful of how they share reviews of their goods online to avoid a similar costly penalty.

Index
  1. Cherry-picking favorable reviews
    1. FTC is cracking down
    2. Next steps

Cherry-picking favorable reviews

Fashion Nova specializes in “fast fashion,” clothing designed and manufactured quickly so that it can be sold in real time to match constantly evolving fashion trends (and often at relatively low prices). Fashion Nova markets heavily through social media, including Instagram, but primarily sells its fashion via its website, which includes a “REVIEWS” section at the bottom of each product page where customers provide one to five star ratings.

In its complaint, the FTC alleged that Fashion Nova installed a third-party online product review management interface which allowed Fashion Nova to select which types of reviews would automatically be published versus those that would need to be reviewed by the company prior to posting. Fashion Nova allegedly chose to have higher reviews (four- and five-star ratings) automatically post, but would review and decline to publish the “hundreds of thousands” of lower-starred, more negative reviews. The FTC asserts that suppressing negative reviews “deprives consumers of potentially useful information and artificially inflates the product’s average star rating.”

As part of the proposed settlement, Fashion Nova will be required to post on its website all customer reviews of products currently being sold, with exception of those unrelated to product or containing unlawful or obscene content, in addition to the hefty monetary fine.

FTC is cracking down

While the FTC has historically spoken out against review suppression and fake reviews, whether on a retailer’s own website or its social media pages, this case is the first where the FTC has formally complained that a company’s failure to post negative reviews constitutes a deceptive practice in violation of the FTC Act. The FTC is also sending warning letters to at least 10 online review management companies, advising them not to avoid collecting or publishing negative reviews. Ultimately the risk lies with the retailer, however, even if they have outsourced review management to a third party. And the FTC released new guidance for online retailers and review platforms on how to comply with the agency’s principles for collecting and publishing customer reviews without misleading consumers.

On January 28, 2022, the FTC published the proposed consent agreement with Fashion Nova in the Federal Register. Interested parties are encouraged to file comments, which must be received on or before February 28, 2022.

Next steps

In light of this recent settlement, companies, particularly online retailers, must exercise caution when collecting and publishing customer reviews, or when hiring a third-party to provide this service. To avoid misleading consumers, retailers should be certain that they are soliciting reviews that will give an honest picture of what consumers think about their business and goods or services. Develop a strategy for how to effectively handle and mitigate any negative reviews; don’t just hide them from your customers and ignore them, or you’ll face a reckoning from the FTC.

If you have questions regarding what this proposed consent agreement could mean for your company and e-commerce activities, please contact Meryl Bernstein and Brendan C. Quinn.

 

 

Authored by Meryl Bernstein, Brendan C. Quinn, and Hadley Dreibelbis.

Contacts
Meryl Bernstein
Partner
Washington, D.C.
Brendan Quinn
Associate
Washington, D.C.
Index
  1. Cherry-picking favorable reviews
    1. FTC is cracking down
    2. Next steps
Additional Resources
  • FTC Complaint
  • Industry Letters
Keywords Intellectual property, Federal Trade Commission, FTC, advertising, marketing, consumer protection, online reviews, false advertising, unfair competition
Languages English
Topics Consumer, Competition and Intellectual Property Rights, IP Enforcement, Trademarks and Brands, Unfair Competition, Retail and Fashion, E-Commerce
Countries United States
Delete Comment ?

Are you sure want to delete comment ?

Get link
Embed
Share by email
Get QR Code

Scan this QR Code to share this content